Download A Companion to Applied Ethics by R. G. Frey, Christopher Heath Wellman PDF

By R. G. Frey, Christopher Heath Wellman

This can be a rather first-class choice of articles on all kinds of truly attention-grabbing subject matters in utilized ethics. a person who thinks that educational philosophers are not "practical" or are not focused on "real international" concerns and difficulties should still have a look at this booklet. it truly is simply jam-packed with fascinating and demanding stuff. the entire entries i have learn are highly transparent and good written and supply an outstanding advent to the subject. i'm hoping it will definitely comes out in paperback so it truly is more uncomplicated to buy!

Show description

Read or Download A Companion to Applied Ethics PDF

Similar history & surveys books

Common Sense (Dover Thrift Editions)

Greatly renowned and commonly learn pamphlet, first released in January of 1776, essentially and persuasively argues for American separation from nice Britain and paves the best way for the assertion of Independence. This hugely influential landmark record assaults the monarchy, cites the evils of presidency and combines idealism with functional monetary issues.

The Complete Idiot's Guide to Statistics, 2nd Edition

No longer a numbers individual? No challenge! This re-creation is aimed toward highschool and school scholars who have to take records to meet a level requirement and follows a customary facts curriculum. Readers will locate info on frequency distributions; suggest, median, and mode; diversity, variance, and traditional deviation; chance; and extra.

The Philosophy of Simondon: Between technology and individuation

The final 20 years have obvious an incredible elevate within the scholarly curiosity in know-how, and feature provoked new strains of concept in philosophy, sociology and cultural experiences. New disciplines akin to cyber-culture stories and Informatics were sprung up, and the information of Simondon are relevant to those debates.

Humean Moral Pluralism

Michael B. Gill deals an unique account of Humean ethical pluralism. ethical pluralism is the view that there are assorted final ethical purposes for motion, that these diversified purposes can occasionally come into clash with one another, and that there exist no invariable ordering ideas that let us know the right way to get to the bottom of such conflicts.

Extra resources for A Companion to Applied Ethics

Example text

Do we have a moral obligation not to harm members of any species? Or is the fact that an action would harm another person relevant to its being wrong in a way that harm to other species is not? Here again we cannot answer this question without taking a stand on meta-ethical issues concerning what morality and moral obligation are if only implicitly If we understand moral questions broadly enough then it may seem that harm is harm and is no less morally relevant whether the being harmed is a person or a snail darter If however we think of morality as a system of reciprocity or mutual accountability where norms of right and wrong mediate a moral community of free and equal moral persons then harm to other persons will seem to have an intrinsic moral relevance that harm to other species does not For then what is morally wrong will be what one can be held accountable by others for doing in accordance with norms that must in some sense be acceptable to all from a perspective of equality So viewed harm to persons is not simply harm to members of a certain species but harm to a member of the moral community to whom norms of right and wrong must be justifiable This is only one example of how questions of meta-ethics are implicitly involved in issues of normative ethical theory and therefore in case ethics Ultimately we have no alternative but to pursue philosophical ethics, that is to attempt to work out a comprehensive outlook that integrates normative ethics and meta-ethics (Darwall 1998) Contractarianism/Contractualism We can turn now to a review of different normative theories and begin with one that can be grounded in the meta-ethical theory of morality as reciprocity or mutual accountability just mentioned This is the idea that whether an action is right or wrong depends on whether it accords with or violates principles that would be the object of an agreement contract or choice made under certain conditions by members of the moral community The general idea can be developed in a variety of ways depending on how the choice or agreement the parties who make it and the conditions under which it is made are characterized One broad distinction is between contractarianism, under which the choice of moral principles is self-interested and contractualism, which grounds it in a moral ideal of reciprocity reasonableness or fairness It may seem strange to think that moral principles can in any respect be agreed upon or chosen How can a moral proposition be made true by any choice or agreement?

New York: Columbia University Press Ross W D (1963) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press Rousseau Jean-Jacques (1987) The Social Contract. In The Basic Political Writings, trans Donald A Cress Indianapolis IN: Hackett Scanlon T M (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Slote Michael (1992) From Morality to Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press Thomson Judith (1976) Killing letting die and the trolley problem The Monist, 59: 204-17 Williams Bernard (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.

Here again we cannot answer this question without taking a stand on meta-ethical issues concerning what morality and moral obligation are if only implicitly If we understand moral questions broadly enough then it may seem that harm is harm and is no less morally relevant whether the being harmed is a person or a snail darter If however we think of morality as a system of reciprocity or mutual accountability where norms of right and wrong mediate a moral community of free and equal moral persons then harm to other persons will seem to have an intrinsic moral relevance that harm to other species does not For then what is morally wrong will be what one can be held accountable by others for doing in accordance with norms that must in some sense be acceptable to all from a perspective of equality So viewed harm to persons is not simply harm to members of a certain species but harm to a member of the moral community to whom norms of right and wrong must be justifiable This is only one example of how questions of meta-ethics are implicitly involved in issues of normative ethical theory and therefore in case ethics Ultimately we have no alternative but to pursue philosophical ethics, that is to attempt to work out a comprehensive outlook that integrates normative ethics and meta-ethics (Darwall 1998) Contractarianism/Contractualism We can turn now to a review of different normative theories and begin with one that can be grounded in the meta-ethical theory of morality as reciprocity or mutual accountability just mentioned This is the idea that whether an action is right or wrong depends on whether it accords with or violates principles that would be the object of an agreement contract or choice made under certain conditions by members of the moral community The general idea can be developed in a variety of ways depending on how the choice or agreement the parties who make it and the conditions under which it is made are characterized One broad distinction is between contractarianism, under which the choice of moral principles is self-interested and contractualism, which grounds it in a moral ideal of reciprocity reasonableness or fairness It may seem strange to think that moral principles can in any respect be agreed upon or chosen How can a moral proposition be made true by any choice or agreement?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.63 of 5 – based on 42 votes

Published by admin